Current:Home > ContactJudge rejects Trump’s First Amendment challenge to indictment in Georgia election case -PrimeFinance
Judge rejects Trump’s First Amendment challenge to indictment in Georgia election case
View
Date:2025-04-13 12:33:46
ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case against Donald Trump and others rejected on Thursday arguments by the former president that the indictment seeks to criminalize political speech protected by the First Amendment.
The indictment issued in August by a Fulton County grand jury accused Trump and 18 others of participating in a wide-ranging scheme to illegally try to overturn the 2020 presidential election in Georgia after the Republican incumbent narrowly lost the state to Democrat Joe Biden. Trump’s attorneys argued that all the charges against him involved political speech that is protected even if the speech ends up being false.
But Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote that at this pretrial stage he must consider the language of the indictment in a light favorable to the prosecution. The charges do not suggest that Trump and the others are being prosecuted simply for making false statements but rather that they acted willfully and knowingly to harm the government, he wrote.
“Even core political speech addressing matters of public concern is not impenetrable from prosecution if allegedly used to further criminal activity,” the judge wrote.
He added that even lawful acts involving speech protected by the First Amendment can be used to support a charge under Georgia’s anti-racketeering law, which prosecutors used in this case.
But McAfee did leave open the possibility that Trump and others could raise similar arguments “at the appropriate time after the establishment of a factual record.”
Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead attorney in Georgia, said in an email that Trump and the other defendants “respectfully disagree with Judge McAfee’s order and will continue to evaluate their options regarding the First Amendment challenges.” He called it significant that McAfee made it clear they could raise their challenges again later.
A spokesperson for Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis declined to comment.
McAfee’s order echoes an earlier ruling in the federal election interference case against Trump brought by Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith. U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan wrote in December that “it is well established that the First Amendment does not protect speech that is used as an instrument of a crime.”
McAfee also rejected arguments from Trump co-defendant and former Georgia Republican Party chairman David Shafer challenging certain charges and asking that certain phrases be struck from the indictment. Most of the charges against Shafer have to do with his involvement in the casting of Electoral College votes for Trump by a group of Georgia Republicans even though the state’s election had been certified in favor of Biden.
His lawyers argue that the following phrases are used to assert that the Democratic slate of electors was valid and the Republican slate was not: “duly elected and qualified presidential electors,” “false Electoral College votes” and “lawful electoral votes.” The lawyers said those are “prejudicial legal conclusions” about issues that should be decided by the judge or by the jury at trial.
McAfee wrote that “the challenged language is not prejudicial because it accurately describes the alleged offenses and makes the charges more easily understood by providing a basis to differentiate the allegedly lawful and unlawful acts of presidential electors (as theorized by the State.)” He noted that jurors are repeatedly instructed that an indictment should not be considered evidence.
No trial date has been set for the sprawling Georgia case, one of four criminal cases pending against Trump as he seeks to return to the White House, though Willis has asked for the trial to begin in August. Four people have pleaded guilty after reaching deals with prosecutors. Trump and the others who remain have pleaded not guilty.
veryGood! (749)
Related
- Romantasy reigns on spicy BookTok: Recommendations from the internet’s favorite genre
- The Parched West is Heading Into a Global Warming-Fueled Megadrought That Could Last for Centuries
- Life on an Urban Oil Field
- Machine Gun Kelly and Megan Fox Are Invincible During London Date Night
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- BMW Tests Electric Cars as Power Grid Stabilizers
- Kylie Jenner Officially Kicks Off Summer With 3 White Hot Looks
- Virginia Moves to Regulate Power Plants’ Carbon Pollution, Defying Trump
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Raven-Symoné Reveals Why She's Had Romantic Partners Sign NDAs
Ranking
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- In Florence’s Floodwater: Sewage, Coal Ash and Hog Waste Lagoon Spills
- SZA Details Decision to Get Brazilian Butt Lift After Plastic Surgery Speculation
- American Climate Video: After a Deadly Flood That Was ‘Like a Hurricane,’ a Rancher Mourns the Loss of His Cattle
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Senate 2020: In Mississippi, a Surprisingly Close Race For a Trump-Tied Promoter of Fossil Fuels
- American Climate Video: When a School Gym Becomes a Relief Center
- These Top-Rated Small Appliances From Amazon Are Perfect Great Graduation Gifts
Recommendation
Louvre will undergo expansion and restoration project, Macron says
Keystone XL Pipeline Hit with New Delay: Judge Orders Environmental Review
Judge Dismisses New York City Climate Lawsuit Against 5 Oil Giants
Water Use in Fracking Soars — Exceeding Rise in Fossil Fuels Produced, Study Says
Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
Could Climate Change Be the End of the ‘Third World’?
Dolphins use baby talk when communicating with calves, study finds
Transcript: Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Face the Nation, June 25, 2023